ТРАДИЦИИ НАУЧНОГО ИЗУЧЕНИЯ ПРОБЛЕМЫ ГЕНДЕРНОГО РАВЕНСТВА
Сарибаева Умида Саттаровна, доцент кафедры общей психологии ТДПУ им. Низоми, кандидат психологических наук
Ключевые слова:
Дифференциальная социализация, гендерные различия, научно- теоретические взгляды, гендерное равенство, биологические, культурные, экономические, политические, правовые, социально-психологические аспекты, научные источники, анализ литературы.Аннотация
В данной статье были освещены научно-теоретические взгляды на формирование гендерных различий, биологические, культурные, экономические, политические, правовые, социально-психологические аспекты гендерного равенства, научные источники, анализ и обзор литературы.
Библиографические ссылки
Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354-364. Bem, S. L. (1989). Genital knowledge and gender constancy in preschool children. Child Development, 60,649-662.
Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Betz, N. (1993). Women’s career development In F. L. Denmark & M. A. Paludi (Eds.), Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories (pp. 627-684). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Degler, C. N. (1990). Darwinians confront gender; or, There is more to it than history. In D. L. Rhode (Ed.), Theoretical perspectives on sexual difference (pp. 33-46). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Hyde, J. S. (1991). Half the human experience: The psychology of women (4th ed.). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath and Company.
Ishii-Kuntz, M. (1993). Japanese fathers: Work demands and family roles. In J. C. Hood (Ed.), Men, work, and family (pp. 45-67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Miller, C. L. (1987). Qualitative differences among gender-stereotyped toys: Implications for cognitive and social development in girls and boys. Sex Roles, 16,473-487.
Jacklin, C. N. (1989). Female and mate: Issues of gender. American Psychologist, 44,127- 133.
Kenrick, O. T. (1987). Gender, genes, and the social environment: A biosocial interactionist perspective. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.), Sex and gender: Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 14-43). Beverly Hills, Sage. Kenrick, D. T. (1988). Biology: Si! Hard-wired ability: Maybe no. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 199-200.
Lott, B. (1991). Social psychology: Humanist roots and feminist future. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15,505-519.
Miller, C. L. (1987). Qualitative differences among gender-stereotyped toys: Implications for cognitive and social development in girls and boys. Sex Roles, 16,473-487. Tavris, C. (1992). The mismeasure of woman. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Mischel, W. (1970). Sex typing and socialization. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology (Vol.2). New York: Wiley. Orlofsky, J. L. (1977). Sex-role orientation, identity formation, and self-esteem in college men and women. Sex Roles, 3, 561-575.
O’Neil, J. M. (1990). Assessing men’s gender role conflict. In D. Moore & F. Leafgren (Eds.), Problem solving strategies and interventions for men in conflict (pp. 23-38). Alexandria, VA: American Association for Counseling and Development. 13. Orlofsky, J. L. (1977). Sex-role orientation, identity formation, and self-esteem in college men and women. Sex Roles, 3, 561-575.
Spence, J. Т., & Helmrich, R. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Шон Бруно. Гендерная социализация. М., 1990 г. С – 30.
Електрон адабиёт Марк Бартен. https://mark-barton.com/onlayn-kursy psihologiya/ Instagram. utm_source= Inst & utm medium=insta_barton_taplink&utm_campaign=ya_takaya_odna_udobnaya_ili_unikalnaya&utm_ content=01_2023.
