REFLECTION OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF POSTMODERN LITERATURE IN THE WORKS OF DAVID MITCHELL

Ruzieva Saodat Khasanovna, Master of the Bukhara State University, Faculty of Foreign Languages and Literature

Authors

  • Ruzieva Saodat Khasanovna

Keywords:

postmodernism, realism, paradigm, hermeneutics, poststructuralism, modernism, subjectivity, rationality, postmodern paradigm, simulation, society of spectacle.

Abstract

: The specific method of social research offered within the framework of the postmodern paradigm determines its application to modern social science. This article examines the main features of postmodernism as a theoretical framework, as well as an analysis of the main concepts and ideas of David Mitchell as its most prominent representative. Based on his work, the writer wants to convey the ideas to the reader and the importance of these ideas for the future destiny of humanity is briefly discussed. Representatives of postmodern literature do not express the concept of time and space, but their views on human emotions, thoughts, and dreams of the future. The article also partially covers the fact that David Mitchell’s views are different from the representatives of such literature.

References

Adams, Rachel. “The Ends of America, the Ends of Postmodernism.” TwentiethCentury Literature: A Scholarly and Critical Journal 53, no.3 (2007): 248- 272. 2. Augustyn, Adam. “David Mitchell.” In Encyclopaedia Britannica, November

, 2015. Accessed September 1, 2016. 3. Coope, Jonathon. “The Ecological Blind Spot in Postmodernism.” New

Formations 64, (2008): 78-89. 4. Кравченко С.А. Социологический постмодернизм: теоретические источники, концепции, словарь терминов. — М.: Моск. гос. ин-т междунар. отношений (ун-т) МИД России 2010. C. 12. 5. Можейко М.А., Лепин С. Дискурс // Постмодернизм. Энциклопедия. — Минск: Интерпрессервис; Книжный Дом, 2001. C. 233. 6. Ильин И.П. Постструктурализм. Деконструктивизм. Постмодернизм. — М.: Интрада, 1996. 7. Бодрийяр Ж. Симулякры и симуляция // Философия эпохи постмодерна. — Минск: Красико-принт, 1996. C. 34.

Published

2023-04-16