THE DIFFERENT PECULIARITIES OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS WITH SOMATIC COMPONENTS IN MODERN LINGUISTICS
Saydamatov Ikrom, lecturer at Uzbekistan State world languages university
Keywords:
body parts, expression, cultural values, body part, connotation, function, cognition, concept, somatism, component.Abstract
This article is mainly about the different features of phraseological units with somatic components and their stylistic and morphological functions. Somatic componential phraseological units are often considered a subcategory of idioms, which are multi-word expressions that have a meaning that cannot be inferred from the literal meanings of the individual words. However, unlike some idioms that are based on cultural or historical references, somatic componential phraseological units are based on the body and its functions, which are universal and cross-cultural.
References
A.A. Tilshunoslikka kirish. 2–qism. Leksikologiya va semasiologiya. Grammatika. – T.:1999. –57 b.
Abdulaevo A. Frazeologizmning ekpressivlik xususiyati // O‘zbek tili va adabiyoti, 1976, 5–son. 36–39 b.
Abdullaev D. Ayrim somatik frazemalar/ Muloqot. 1997–yil 5–son. B.105–106.
Abdullaev X.D. Xalq maqollarining “Qutadg‘u bilig” poetikasidagi o‘rni va badiiy estetik funksiyalari: Filol. fan. nomzod. ... diss. Toshkent, 2005. – 152 b.
Almamatova Sh.T. O‘zbek tili frazemalarining komponent tahlili: Filol. fan. nomzod. ... diss. – Toshkent, 2008. – 117 b. 6.Амосова Н.Н. Основи английской фразеологии. – Ленинград: Ленинградский унив, 1963. – 207с.
Арнолд И.В. Стилистика современного английского язика. –Л.: Просвешение, 1981. – 395 с.
Балли Ш. Французкая стилистика. – М.: Изд–во иностранной лит–ри, 1961. 391 б.
Бердиёров Х, Расулов Р. Ўзбек тилининг паремиологик луғати. – Тошкент: Ўқитувчи, 1984. – 232 б.
В.И.Карасик “Языковой круг: личность, концепции, дискурс”. Волгоград, 2002.
Бозорбоев К.Т. Ўзбек сўзлашув нутқи фразеологизмлари: Филол. фан. номзоди. ... дис. – Самарқанд, 2001. – 135 б. 12.Боркачев С.Г. Лингвистика языковая личность, концепт: становление антропоцентрической парадигми в языкознании// Филологические науки 2001. №1