TECHNOLOGY FOR ASSESSMENT OF THE PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY OF PROFESSORS-TEACHERS OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS ON THE BASE OF INDICATORS OF STUDENTS’ SATISFACTION
Ibraimov Kholboy, Director of the Scientific Research Institute of Pedagogical Sciences of Uzbekistan named after Qori Niyozi, Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor. Urakov Sherzod Rakhmanovich, Director of SamSU Kattakorgan Branch, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Pedagogical Sciences
Keywords:
educational environment of the university, student satisfaction, students, university reputation, pedagogical knowledge and culture, teaching skills, student support, assessment of student knowledge.Abstract
This article analyzes ways to improve the quality of educational services in higher educational institutions, in particular, improving the system of critical performance indicators (KPI) in improving the activities of teaching staff. On this basis, a technology for assessing the professional activities of university teachers based on student satisfaction indicators is proposed. Latent factors for assessing the professional activities of professors and teachers have been developed.
References
Rahmatov M.A., Zaripov B.Z. Iste’dodli insonlar mamlakatning bebaho boyligidir. Li Kuan Yu hikmatlari. – T.: “Zamin Nashr”, 2019. – 6-bet.
Dehghan A., J. Dugger, D. Dobrzykowski, and A. Balazs, “The antecedents of student loyalty in online programs”, Int. J. Educ.
Manag., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 15-35, 2014.
Hoverstad R., R.Sylvester, and K. E.Voss, “Key Factors Influencing Student Satisfaction Related to Recruitment and Retention”, no. november 2014. pp. 37-41, 2008.
Khoo H., Susie and S.T.Gregor, “Service quality and student/customer satisfaction in the private tertiary education sector in Singapore”. Int. J.Educ. Manag., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 430-444, 2017
Lesley L., S.Kalafatis “The idiosyncratic behavior of service quality, value, satisfaction, and intention to recommend in higher education: An empirical examination”. Journal of Marketing Management Vol. 27, Nos. 11-12, October, 2011.
Masserini L., M.Bini, and M.Pratesi, “Do Quality of Services and Institutional Image Impact Students’ Satisfaction and Loyalty in Higher Education?”, Soc. Indie. Res., vol. 146, no. 1-2, pp. 91-115, 2019
Chapman V., and A. Doris, “Modelling higher education financing reform for Ireland”. Econ. Educ. Rev., vol. 71, pp. 109-119, 2019.
Allam Z., “Demystifying the Aspect of Quality in Higher Education: Insights From Saudi Arabia”. SAGE Open, vol. 10, no. 1, 2020.
Iacovidou M., P.Gibbs, and A.Zopiatis, “An exploratory use of the stakeholder approach to defining and measuring quality: The case of a cypriot higher education institution”. Qual. High. Educ, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 147-165, 2009.
Dagayeva I. A., Baxotskiy V. V., Strikunova L. I. Diagnostika udovletvorennosti studentov obrazovatelnoy sredoy vuza v selyax povыsheniya yego privlekatelnosti dlya abituriyentov // Vestnik Surgutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2022. № 2 (36). S. 42–50. DOI 10.34822/2312-3419-2022-2-42-50
Husenov S., Haydarov R., Xushvaqtov X., Qodirov M., Boboyev N. Professor-o’qituvchilarning dars jarayonidagi faoliyatini baholash. Monografiya. – Samarqand: “FAN BULOG’I” nashriyoti, 2021. – 120 B.
