KOGNITIV TA’LIM NAZARIYASI VA RIVOJLANISHI: NODAVLAT OLIY TA’LIM MISOLIDA
Axmedov Davlatbek Saloxidin o‘g‘li University of Business and Science universiteti Pedagogika va psixologiya kafedrasi o‘qituvchisi
Ключевые слова:
kognitiv qobiliyatlar, fikrlash, nodavlat oliy ta’lim muassasalari, fikrlash, yangi ko‘nikmalarni rivojlanirish.Аннотация
Kognitiv qobiliyatlar fikrlash, o‘qish va o‘rganishni osonlashtiradi, shuningdek, ma’lumotni saqlash, fikr yuritish va javob berishga yordam beradi. Kognitiv rivojlanish nazariyalari insonning go‘daklikdan qarilikka qadar qanday rivojlanishi va o‘zgarishini tushuntirishga harakat qiladi. Kognitiv nazorat vazifalarni qondirish uchun fikrlar, his-tuyg‘ular va xatti-harakatlarni tanlash orqali bir vaqtning o‘zida noodatiy harakatlarni shakllantiradi. Ushbu maqolada kognitiv rivojlanish bo‘yicha oldingi va zamonaviy nazariyalarning to‘pladik. Tadqiqot natijalari shuni ko‘rsatdiki, nodavlat oliy ta’lim talabalarilarning kognitiv qobiliyatlari bilan bog‘liq bo‘lgan kurslarni o‘tashlari foydalidir, chunki bu ularning ijobiy rivojlanishiga yordam beradi. Tadqiqot natijalari shuni tasdiqlaydiki, o‘qish yangi ko‘nikmalarni rivojlantirish va bilim bazasini kengaytirish imkonini beradi. Nodavlat oliy ta’lim muassasalari talabalarining o‘rganish va muvaffaqiyatga erishish haqidagi fikrlari kognitiv jarayondan kelib chiqadi.
Библиографические ссылки
Miller EK, Cohen JD. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual review of neuroscience. 2001;24(1):167-202
Tiego J, Testa R, Bellgrove MA, Pantelis C, Whittle S. A hierarchical model of inhibitory control. Frontiers in Psychology. 2018;9:1339
Yerys BE, Bertollo JR, Kenworthy L, Dawson G, Marco EJ, Schultz RT, et al. Brief report: Pilot study of a novel interactive digital treatment to improve cognitive control in children with autism spectrum disorder and co-occurring ADHD symptoms. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 2019;49(4):1727-1737
Best JR, Miller PH. A developmental perspective on executive function. Child development. 2010;81(6):1641-1660
Morales J, Calvo A, Bialystok E. Working memory development in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2013;114(2):187-202
Phillips CML, Gulley AP, Pearson YE, Smith LE, Eyler J, Noble S, et al. Solving Problems of Mathematics Accessibility with Process-driven Math: Methods and Implications. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings; 2018
Miller PH. Piaget’s theory: Past, present, and future. In: Goswami U, editor. The Wiley- Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development. Wiley Blackwell; 2011. pp. 649-672
Vygotsky LS, Cole M. Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press; 1978
Taylor K. Diverse and critical perspectives on cognitive development theory. New Directions for Student Services. 2016;154:29-41
Kellermann TS, Bonilha L, Lin JJ, Hermann BP. Mapping the landscape of cognitive development in children with epilepsy. Cortex. 2015;66:1-8. Language Learners’ English Development. Child Development
Gascon M, Triguero-Mas M, Martínez D, Dadvand P, Forns J, Plasència A, et al. Mental health benefits of long-term exposure to residential green and blue spaces: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2015;12(4):4354-4379. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13558
Barac R, Bialystok E, Castro DC, Sanchez M. The cognitive development of young dual language Learners: A critical review. Early Child Research Quarterly. 2014;29(4):699-714
Sun H, Bornstein MH, Esposito G. The specificity principle in young dual language learners’ English development. Child Development. 2021;92(5):1752-1768
Skinner BF. Cognitive science and behaviorism. British Journal of Psychology. 1985;76(3):291-301
Pedro EdM, Leitão J, Alves H. Stakeholders’ perceptions of sustainable development of higher education institutions: An intellectual capital approach. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2020;21(5):911-942. DOI: 10.1108/IJSHE-01-2020-0030
Zhang LF, Watkins D. Cognitive development and student approaches to learning: An investigation of Perry’s theory with Chinese and US university students. Higher Education. 2001;41(3):239-261. DOI: 10.1023/A:1004151226395
Ikromovna TO. The development of creativity in the students of higher education institutions as an urgent pedagogical problem. In: E Conference Zone. 2022. pp. 301-303
Zhoc KC, Webster BJ, King RB, Li JC, Chung TS. Higher education student engagement scale (HESES): Development and psychometric evidence. Research in Higher Education. 2019;60:219-244
